In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.
The Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution
The Green Agenda also known as Anthropogenic (human-caused) Climate Change is the ‘scientific’ justification to bring society into a new age of austerity, we will simply pay to exist, consumption and choices will be a thing of the past. You will own nothing and be happy.
This is part of the long-range strategy for a World Communist system and the climate change narrative is the chosen vehicle to drive us there. It instils a sense in the average person that their life is a burden to the collective of humanity, individual rights are to be squashed and ‘take a backseat’ as Harvey Ruvin of The Wildlands Project puts it.
Democracy has always been an illusion to keep us docile and under the impression we have choices but even that will be no more and we will be openly governed by corporations under the Great Reset plan for Stakeholder Capitalism which will make governments one among many voices, without having the final say, governments would be just one stakeholder in a multi-stakeholder model of global governance.
There is no ‘scientific consensus’ as the mainstream news would have you believe on the theories behind man-made global warming, also there have been people who have admitted openly that it is about economic policy and not about the environment. Climate Gate exposed how the science was twisted around to produce the famous ‘hockey stick’ graph by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which shows we are at unprecedented level of global warming by excluding the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period. They also used other coercive methods such as blackmail and threat of removal of funding to ensure science journals pulled papers which went against their ‘evidence’. Despite this though nothing has changed and the policies are accelerating demonstrating the true power of the establishment scientific elite.
There are many different aspects to this greening of everything which need careful consideration and study to understand, the commodification of nature, abolishment of private property, pushing people into smart cities, post-consumerism, Communitarianism, carbon credits, post-democracy, the end of travel, meat and dairy consumption and Environmental Social Governance Scores (ESG).
Even people working for the government such as Michael Kelly of the Royal Society came out and said that the public have no idea of the implications of Net-Zero, the cost and the crushing burden that will be put onto the life of the every day man or woman. He said the only way to achieve Net-Zero by 2050 would be a Command Economy aka Communism, which is very convenient for the bankers, think-tanks, psychologists and social scientists who have been advocating for this change in their books and papers way before even the ‘climate crisis’ came about. These same groups who fund the climate movement such as the Wall Street elite are the ones who managed the spread of Communism in China and Russia through revolutions, they were not revolutions of the people revolting that is a facade, they were carefully crafted and planned for by this dominant minority who seek to take over every aspect of our lives; it was a precursor or stepping stone and a testing ground before bringing Communism to the West, which began on a large scale in the 1950's.
The theory of Anthropogenic Climate Change is a lot like Social Darwinism and The Theory of Evolution in that it is bogus and a means to an end to walk us where the scientific elite want us to go, a new sheep pen for the masses to graze but we have to choose to go into it willingly we cannot be entirely forced in, we have to play the part of the willing fool. Social Darwinism was to create the scientific justification for a small dominant minority to rule over the public - ‘survival of the fittest’, and like the Green Agenda Darwinism became interwoven with the very fabric of society and is intergrated completely with mainstream belief systems now. It took away the popular conception at the time that a human soul was special and the individual was important and had a divine purpose, it was a way to demoralise us and upgrade from the old system which was Christianity in preparation for the coming New Age Communitarianism and technological era of depravity and immorality.
The Green Agenda is a product of the same people who brought us Social Darwinism - the eugenics movement. It will be used in the future to justify depopulation of mankind, even though you could put all 8 billion people on the planet in the State of Texas and it still wouldn’t be as densely populated as New York City.
We have been dominated by these groups of intergenerational old money families since the early days of recorded history, they have incrementally taken over everything through Secret Societies and Mystery Schools, controlling countries, Kings, Queens and rulers alike as if they were pieces on a chess board.
​
Below we have put together sections which show some of the scientific fraud being carried out and arm you with resources and links which will help you become educated on these issues and begin to push back and create talking points which you can disseminate to the people around you.
"...we are effectively redistributing world wealth through climate policy... One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy."
- Ottmar Edenhofer - Director of the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change; and former IPCC official
Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today's problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time."
- The Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution
"I hope this report gives the bare facts about what is implied by committing
to a net-zero emissions economy for 2050.
Short of a command economy, it is simply an unattainable pipe dream"
- Michael Kelly - The Royal Society - Delivering Net Zero
At the bottom, the blue, purple and green lines show the actual reality temperature observations against which the models’ predictions were tested.
​
The dotted lines are 102 temperature “simulations” (predictions) made by the models from 32 institutions for the period 1979-2016.
​
The red line is the consensus of the models, their average.
​
The graph clearly shows 101 of the 102 predictions by the models (dotted lines) and their consensus average (red line) fail miserably to predict reality.
​
Mototaka Nakamura previously a scientist at the International Pacific Research Centre has spoke out about the issues with climate modelling in ‘Confessions of a climate scientist: The global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis’
​
“Climate forecasting is simply impossible, if only because future changes in solar energy output are unknowable. As to the impacts of human-caused CO2, they can’t be judged with the knowledge and technology we currently possess.
​
The supposed measuring of global average temperatures from 1890 has been based on thermometer readouts barely covering 5 per cent of the globe until the satellite era began 40-50 years ago. We do not know how global climate has changed in the past century, all we know is some limited regional climate changes, such as in Europe, North America and parts of Asia. This makes meaningless the Paris targets of 1.5degC or 2degC above pre-industrial levels.
​
Modellers are merely trying to construct narratives that justify the use of these models for climate predictions.
​
The take-home message is that all climate simulation models, even those with the best parametric representation scheme for convective motions and clouds, suffer from a very large degree of arbitrariness in the representation of processes that determine the atmospheric water vapour and cloud fields. Since the climate models are tuned arbitrarily …there is no reason to trust their predictions/forecasts.”
​
Rather than being settled it’s more like the science has been hijacked. The doomsday scenario laid out before us does not represent the opinions of all scientists only the few that have been selected to reinforce the narrative, who are paid generously and elevated to high status in society.
According to the World Wildlife Fund: Global average sea level has risen by about 7–8 inches since 1900 and it’s getting worse. Rising seas endanger coastal cities and small island nations by exacerbating coastal flooding and storm surge, making dangerous weather events even more so. Glacial melt of the Greenland ice sheet is a major predictor of future sea level rise; if it melts entirely, global sea levels could rise 20 feet.”
​
Interestingly this study from The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) states otherwise:
​
We have been studying climate change and potentially associated sea level changes resulting from melting ice and warming oceans for a half century. In the 1970s our primary concern was global cooling and an advancing new ice age. Many believe that increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere could result in rising levels of the sea in general. The record does not show this to be true. There is no evidence whatever to support impending sea-level-rise catastrophe or the unnecessary expenditure of state or federal tax monies to solve a problem that does not exist.
The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has updated its coastal sea level tide gauge data which continues to show no evidence of accelerating sea level rise. These measurements include tide gauge data at coastal locations along the West Coast, East Coast, Gulf Coast, Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as seven Pacific Island groups and six Atlantic Island groups, comprising more than 200 measurement stations.
​
Their research shows that there has been no more than a foot rise in sea level every century and that level has remained the steady over the last 170 years.
​
The relative sea level trend is 2.92 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.09 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1856 to 2023 which is equivalent to a change of 0.96 feet in 100 years.
​
The Climategate scandal started in 2009 when emails and documents were stolen and leaked from the CRU (Climatic Research Unit) in East Anglia, England. They showed how lead scientists from the IPCC who created the ‘Hockey Stick’ graph which allegedly shows the global or hemispherical mean temperature record of the past 500 to 2000 years – did so in an unscientific way, collaborated to silence critics and engaged in data manipulation which was portrayed as evidence that backed up the theory on man-made global warming which forms policy today.
​
The archive contains over 1000 emails and 3000 documents which span over 13 years and has been released in two sets. The documents were stolen allegedly by Chinese hackers and then uploaded to a server which was then distributed to climate sceptics and mainstream media outlets.
After five investigations were completed the climate scientists were absolved of any wrong doing, it was claimed the emails had been taken out of context and many reports emerged that upheld the same opinion and state vehemently no misconduct had taken place.
​
On further examination of the investigations carried out it appears that they were not conducted in a thorough and objective way and were stacked with conflict of interest and a complete lack of research and scrutiny.
Read this report which details the conflicts of interest and supression of opposition: https://www.rossmckitrick.com/uploads/4/8/0/8/4808045/rmck_climategate.pdf
See this excerpt from a Forbes article regarding the second Climategate email release:
“A new batch of 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion that humans are causing a global warming crisis were anonymously released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm of controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal.
​
Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.
​
The original Climategate emails contained similar evidence of destroying information and data that the public would naturally assume would be available according to freedom of information principles. “Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith [Briffa] re AR4 [UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment]?” Jones wrote to Penn State University scientist Michael Mann in an email released in Climategate 1.0. “Keith will do likewise. ... We will be getting Caspar [Ammann] to do likewise. I see that CA [the Climate Audit Web site] claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!”
​
These new emails add weight to Climategate 1.0 emails revealing efforts to politicize the scientific debate. For example, Tom Wigley, a scientist at the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, authored a Climategate 1.0 email asserting that his fellow Climategate scientists “must get rid of” the editor for a peer-reviewed science journal because he published some papers contradicting assertions of a global warming crisis.
​
More than revealing misconduct and improper motives, the newly released emails additionally reveal frank admissions of the scientific shortcomings of global warming assertions.”
Many factors determine the level of C02 such as volcanoes and weather events. There have been studies which show that plants are somewhat starved of C02 at the current levels we are at today.
​
This study by the Smithsonian Institute summarises:
​
“Speed is not a word typically associated with trees; they can take centuries to grow. However, a new study finds evidence that forests in the Eastern United States are growing faster than they have in the past 225 years. The study offers a rare look at how an ecosystem is responding to climate change.”
​
Indoor plant growers who add C02 to their crops have found that plants grow best at around 1,500 parts per million, and actually cease to grow at around 300 parts per million (we are currently at 400ppm) so attempting to reduce the carbon in the atmosphere potentially could be a huge problem in the future for food security with massive burdens already placed on farmers worldwide because of net-zero targets and climate change policy.
There is a lot of literature also that shows that the increased C02 we are witnessing is natural and not from human driven emissions, see the following link for a collection of 159 scientific research papers which conclude in their results that there is no significant difference to the Earth’s climate from human C02 production:
​
Not only is the new green deal a total deprivation to the lower classes it is a very profitable endeavour for the ruling elite who are orchestrating it, the estimated value of nature conservation and related activities is 125 trillion US dollars a year (source: https://web.archive.org/web/20210308115331/https://capitalscoalition.org/the-value-of-ecosystem-services-from-giant-panda-reserves/)
​
The commodification of nature often referred to as Nature Capital and Ecosystem Services is being managed by the Worlds most powerful corporations:
​
Corporations and philanthropists use tax evading foundation systems to cash in on the new deals being implemented and are already heavily invested in the process and ensuring them and their friends get first dibs on the sinister new control mechanism.
​
Here are a couple of articles that explain and detail the commodification of nature:
​
​
Lavosisier Group:
​
Watts Up With That:
​
Climate Fact:
​
C02 Coalition:
​
C02 Science:
​
JustFacts:
​
Climate Audit:
​
Daily Sceptic:
​
Wrong Kind of Green:
https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/
​
The Art of Annihilation:
https://www.theartofannihilation.com/
​
No Tricks Zone:
​
​
​
